I say this all the time:

I’ll give a school a pass as I drive up.

The outside can be plain. The sign can be simple. I’m not judging the work from the parking lot. But once I walk into the building, it should look like a STEM school. More importantly, it should feel like a STEM school.

That’s the real test.

Because a school can have the label. It can have the banners, the lab, the partnership, the STEM night, and the signature program everybody points to. And still, when you walk through the building on a regular day, the actual STEM experience is hard to find.

I’ve seen that more than once.

Everything looks right on paper. The language is there. The branding is there. The intentions are there. But then you get into classrooms, hallways, student work, teacher talk, and the feel of the building, and you realize STEM is still living in pockets instead of living in the culture.

That’s the difference this issue is about.

Some schools can point to STEM. Fewer schools have built a place where people can actually feel it.

And that’s the difference. #ThatIsSTEMrific

Most schools start with programs.

That makes sense.

A STEM night.
A robotics team.
A coding week.
A maker event.
A new lab.
A partnership that brings energy, resources, and visibility.

There’s nothing wrong with that. Programs can be a great entry point. They create excitement. They help people see what is possible. They give a school something concrete to build around.

But programs by themselves do not build a STEM school.

A program is an experience.
A culture is a way of operating.

A program can be placed on a calendar.
A culture has to be built into the way the school functions.

That is where the work gets real.

STEM has to show up in planning, instruction, student talk, problem-solving, collaboration, leadership decisions, and the work students are producing every day.

That is the shift.

A lot of schools invest in the visible parts first: the event, the room, the initiative, the showcase. But the deeper work is the infrastructure underneath it. Shared expectations. Strong planning. Consistent instructional moves. Leadership alignment. Classroom evidence. Student experiences that happen regularly, not occasionally.

That is the difference between something that launches and something that lasts.

Programs create excitement. Infrastructure creates endurance.

A program is something your school does.
A culture is something your school becomes.

The question is not just, Do we have STEM?

The better question is, how is STEM actually showing up in the daily life of this school?

Here are three questions I think school teams need to wrestle with:

1. Is STEM something students experience occasionally, or consistently?
If students only get STEM during special events, themed weeks, or isolated projects, that may be a program. Culture shows up on a regular day.

2. Is STEM dependent on a few champions, or is it embedded in the way the school operates?
Programs can survive on a few champions. Culture shows up when the work is bigger than any one teacher, coach, or leader.

3. Can we point to evidence in classrooms, not just evidence in promotions?
Pictures matter. Banners matter. Social posts matter. But culture is confirmed when you can walk into classrooms and actually see students thinking, designing, collaborating, solving problems, and making real-world connections.

Here’s a question worth using in your next leadership meeting:

If a visitor walked into our classrooms tomorrow, what would they actually see, hear, and collect as evidence that STEM is part of our culture?

That question changes the conversation.

And next month, I’m going to share a tool designed to help with exactly that: the STEM Culture Audit.

Not just a feel-good checklist. A real tool to help teams look closely at whether STEM is showing up as an event, an initiative, or a lived schoolwide culture.

Because culture is confirmed in classrooms, not just in promotions.

Here’s a challenge for your team.

Pick one thing your school is proud of in STEM.

Just one.

Maybe it’s a STEM night.
Maybe it’s your lab.
Maybe it’s robotics.
Maybe it’s a partnership.
Maybe it’s a showcase everybody loves.

Now ask the harder question:

What part of this lives beyond the event itself?

That is where the real conversation starts.

If that experience disappeared tomorrow, what would still be true?

Would students still be doing meaningful problem-solving?
Would teachers still be planning for inquiry and collaboration?
Would there still be evidence of STEM in classrooms?
Would the work keep moving?

If the answer is no, that doesn’t mean the experience was bad. It just means the next step is clear. The school has to build the structures that help the experience outlive the moment.

Try this prompt with your team:

What are we calling STEM that is really an event, and what are we building that will still be here when the event is over?

That question can move a team from celebration mode to systems mode.

And that matters.

Because the goal is not just to create good STEM moments. The goal is to build a school where STEM is expected, experienced, and sustained.

Across schools and districts, I keep seeing the same pattern.

Many schools have visible STEM artifacts. Fewer have an embedded STEM culture.

The signs are easy to spot. STEM nights. Posters. Labs. Partnerships. Career days. Coding events. Showcase moments. All of that can be good. All of that can reflect energy, care, and real effort.

But here’s the tension:

A school can look like STEM from the outside and still be struggling to make STEM visible in the daily instructional core.

That usually shows up in a few ways:

So the issue is not effort.

The issue is infrastructure.

Programs create moments.
Culture creates patterns.

And I’ll say it again: I’ll give a school a pass as I drive up. But once I walk inside, it should look like a STEM school and feel like a STEM school.

A real STEM school should excite the senses.

You should see inquiry.
You should hear collaboration.
You should notice problem-solving.
You should feel the energy of purpose and possibility.

That is the difference between a program people can point to and a culture people can feel.

If this issue hits home, share it with a school leader, coach, or educator who is trying to move the work beyond the event and into the culture.

Subscribe. Share. Reply. Tag a colleague.

@DrWarrenPEdwards on LinkedIn | STEMrific.com

#ThatIsSTEMrific
#STEMCultureMatters
#STEMisEverywhere
#STEMMatters

Not subscribed yet? stemrificdispatch.beehiiv.com